Wyoming Unit 60 Mule Deer Hunting Guide

Wyoming Unit 60 is a mule deer hunting unit that draws attention from both resident and nonresident hunters looking for a mix of accessible public ground and a genuine chance at a mature buck. Spanning 311,466 acres with elevations ranging from 6,073 to 9,031 feet, the unit offers the kind of varied terrain — from lower sagebrush benches to higher timbered ridgelines — that mule deer use seasonally as they move through the year. For hunters researching Wyoming Unit 60 mule deer hunting as a potential draw choice, understanding the unit's harvest trends, herd data, and application structure is essential before committing points or planning a trip.

Unlike many Wyoming units where wilderness designations complicate nonresident access, Unit 60 carries 0% wilderness acreage, meaning there's no state-mandated outfitter requirement tied to wilderness boundaries here. That said, with only 27% of the unit in public ownership, hunters need to go in with a clear understanding of where they can legally hunt, since the majority of the acreage sits in private hands.

HuntPilot Analysis: Is Unit 60 Worth Applying For?

Based on data compiled by HuntPilot, Unit 60 presents a mixed but not unreasonable case for hunters weighing where to spend their Wyoming deer applications. The recent harvest numbers are a genuine strength: in 2025, 521 hunters harvested 248 mule deer for a 48% success rate, and in 2024, 452 hunters posted a 54% success rate with 242 animals taken. Success rates in the high-40s to mid-50s percent range are respectable for mule deer anywhere in the West, and the consistency across two years suggests this isn't a fluke — hunters who draw a tag here have a solid chance of connecting.

The herd data introduces more caution. The average buck:doe ratio across three surveys from 2021-2024 sits at 28:100, which is on the low end for a healthy mule deer herd. A ratio this low typically points to limited buck age structure and fewer mature bucks surviving to older age classes, which matters for hunters chasing bigger deer rather than just filling a tag. This aligns with the broader qualitative trophy assessment for the counties overlapping this unit, which shows a moderate history of trophy-class records — not a blank slate, but not a unit known for consistently producing top-end bucks either.

The public land situation is the other major factor. At 27% public land, the majority of Unit 60 is privately held. This significantly limits DIY access options and means hunters need to do real homework — identifying which public parcels are huntable, understanding adjacent private land boundaries, and potentially exploring access arrangements — before assuming they can freely roam the unit. This is not a unit where a hunter can show up and expect wide-open public access typical of higher-public-land units elsewhere in the state.

Bottom line: Unit 60 is worth considering for hunters who prioritize a reasonable chance at harvesting a mule deer and who are willing to do the legwork on access given the limited public land base. It's less compelling for hunters solely chasing a trophy-class buck, given the low buck:doe ratio and moderate trophy history. Residents building points for deer, or nonresidents with a specific access plan already in mind, are the hunters most likely to have a satisfying experience here.

Harvest Success Rates

Harvest data from the most recent two seasons shows Unit 60 performing consistently well in terms of hunter success:

• 2025: 521 hunters afield, 248 harvested, 48% success rate
• 2024: 452 hunters afield, 242 harvested, 54% success rate

These figures represent unit-wide totals across all hunt types. A success rate holding in the high-40s to mid-50s percent range over consecutive years is a meaningful signal — it indicates the deer population is huntable and accessible enough that hunters who draw are regularly filling tags, rather than facing years of frustration. The slight dip from 54% in 2024 to 48% in 2025 is worth noting, but both years remain solidly above what many limited-access mule deer units produce, and hunters should view this as a reasonably reliable pattern rather than an outlier year.

Trophy Quality

Trophy-record data for the counties overlapping Unit 60 shows a moderate history of trophy-class mule deer. This means there is some track record of quality bucks coming from the broader area, but it is not among the units with a strong or exceptional trophy pedigree. It's important to note that trophy records are logged at the county level, not by specific hunt unit, so entries attributed to this area are shared with neighboring units that overlap the same counties — the animals scored may have come from anywhere within that broader geography, not necessarily from inside Unit 60's exact boundaries.

Combined with the buck:doe ratio data discussed below, hunters should approach Unit 60 with realistic expectations: this is a unit that can produce a good, mature buck, but it is not positioned as a premier trophy destination within Wyoming. Hunters whose primary goal is a wall-hanger buck may want to weigh this unit against others with a stronger and more consistent trophy history before committing points.

Herd Health & Population Trends

The wildlife survey data available for Unit 60 covers four survey years between 2021 and 2024, with an average buck:doe ratio of 28:100 across three of those surveys. This ratio is on the lower side for mule deer herds and suggests that the population skews toward fewer bucks per hundred does than what's considered ideal for strong age-class structure and consistent trophy production.

A lower buck:doe ratio doesn't necessarily mean poor hunting — as the harvest data shows, hunters are still finding and harvesting deer at solid rates — but it does suggest that the buck segment of the herd faces more hunting or natural pressure relative to the doe population, which can translate into fewer bucks reaching full maturity. Hunters should treat this ratio as the more reliable long-term indicator of herd composition rather than expecting dramatic swings, since no anomalous single-year spike appears in this dataset that would suggest a small-sample distortion.

For hunters focused on herd health as a decision factor, Unit 60 reads as a functional, huntable population that leans toward more accessible, younger-age-class bucks rather than a unit stacked with mature, older bucks.

Access & Terrain

Unit 60 spans an elevation range of 6,073 to 9,031 feet, giving hunters a mix of lower-elevation sagebrush and grassland terrain transitioning into higher benches and ridgelines as elevation increases. This kind of elevational gradient is typical of mule deer country in this part of Wyoming, where deer often shift between lower foraging ground and higher cover depending on the time of year and weather.

The critical access factor for this unit is the 27% public land figure. With just over a quarter of the unit's 311,466 acres in public ownership, the majority of Unit 60 — nearly three-quarters of the landscape — is privately held. This is a significant consideration for any hunter planning a DIY approach. Hunters should not assume broad, unrestricted access is available across the unit; instead, they'll need to carefully identify which public parcels exist, how they connect to accessible roads, and where private land boundaries limit movement. Given the low public land percentage, this unit does not offer the kind of wide-open public access that defines many other Wyoming mule deer units, and hunters relying purely on public ground should scout carefully or consider private access options before applying.

The unit carries 0% wilderness acreage, so there is no wilderness-related guide requirement affecting nonresident hunters here — that factor simply doesn't apply to Unit 60.

How to Apply

Wyoming's deer application system requires hunters to apply during a defined window each year, and the fee structure varies significantly based on residency and tag type.

For current, year-specific draw odds and application details, hunters should visit HuntPilot's Wyoming state page at /states/wy or check the Wyoming Game and Fish Department's website directly.

Application dates and fees change every draw cycle. For the current deadlines, fees, and draw odds, see HuntPilot's Wyoming page at /states/wy.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the terrain like in Wyoming Unit 60? Unit 60 ranges from 6,073 to 9,031 feet in elevation, offering a mix of lower sagebrush and grassland terrain that transitions into higher benches and ridges. This elevational variety is typical of mule deer habitat in the region, giving deer seasonal options between lower foraging areas and higher cover.

What is harvest success like in Unit 60? Recent harvest data shows strong and consistent success rates: 48% in 2025 (248 of 521 hunters) and 54% in 2024 (242 of 452 hunters). These are solid numbers for a mule deer unit, indicating that hunters who draw a tag have a good likelihood of filling it.

How big are the mule deer in Unit 60? Trophy records for the counties overlapping Unit 60 show a moderate history of trophy-class bucks, meaning some quality animals have come from the broader area historically, but it isn't among Wyoming's premier trophy units. Combined with a below-average buck:doe ratio of 28:100 from recent surveys, hunters should expect a reasonable chance at a mature buck but shouldn't count on this unit as a dedicated trophy destination.

Is Unit 60 worth applying for? It depends on the hunter's priorities. For hunters focused on a solid chance of harvesting a mule deer, the consistent success rates (48-54% over the last two years) make this a reasonably strong option. For hunters chasing a true trophy-class buck, the moderate trophy history and lower buck:doe ratio suggest other units may offer better odds at a mature, higher-scoring animal. The limited 27% public land also means DIY hunters need a solid access plan before applying.

Is Unit 60 a good DIY public land option? With only 27% of the unit in public ownership, Unit 60 is not an ideal DIY public-land unit compared to areas with higher public access. Hunters planning a self-guided hunt should research available public parcels carefully and consider that the majority of the landscape here is privately held, which will require either careful public-land targeting or arranged private access.